DRAFT: This module has unpublished changes.
- Home
- Personal CV
- Research Proposal
- Chronic Research Journals
- Synthesis Paper
- Annotated Bibliography
- Presentations and Evaluations
- Previous Work
- Future Work
- Contact, Downloads, Test Subject Movie Trailers
- Autonomous Tomato Harvester (Ind.)
- Sonar Mapping (APL)
- The Story Template (Ind.)
- Interns of America (Ind.)
- Astrobot (NASA)
- Photo Gallery
- 2010-2011 Story Data
DRAFT: This module has unpublished changes.
DRAFT: This module has unpublished changes.
DRAFT: This module has unpublished changes.
The test group will be compared to a control group. The chosen control group is also referred to as the gold standard. It is what I have chosen as the testable criteria of a classic versus non-classic. Some of the criteria include the following of the subjects.
1.Original form released before 1980 - the duration of one literary generation; also the point of initiation for the post-post modernist literary era 2.Reproduced in some way, one of which must have been a movie
3.The work must be readily available in book stores.
4.The work must be appropriate for young adult audiences.
DRAFT: This module has unpublished changes.
Slide 24
The first graph, Sensitivity: Identifying Classics, shows the percent of gold-standard classics that were also identified as classics by The Story Template algorithm. Six stories out of seven were identified as classics both by the gold standard and by The Story Template. One story out of seven was identified as a classic by the gold standard, but as a non-classic by The Story Template. This score of 86% sensitivity is high, indicating that The Story Template algorithm accurately detected acknowledged classic stories in this small sample size.
DRAFT: This module has unpublished changes.
Show Comments (0) and Tags
In order to comment on this portfolio you must be logged in to the school or organization it is associated with. If you have a Digication account, you may log in below: